Dennison also argued that Depp is not responsible for the negative social media campaign targeting Heard.ĭepp’s team is expected to call their own witnesses on Tuesday and Wednesday to rebut Heard’s claim. (He was a co-star in “Aquaman.”)ĭennison noted that the damage to Heard’s career might have been due to negative press tied to the 2020 defamation trial in the United Kingdom. In quizzing her about other actors, Dennison got Arnold to reveal that she does not know who Patrick Wilson is. On cross-examination, Depp’s attorney Wayne Dennison took issue with several of the comps, suggesting that the actors are more famous than Heard. Arnold testified that Heard should have been able to renegotiate her “Aquaman 2” salary for $4 million or more, but could not because she had no leverage. Heard has claimed she had to “fight” to stay in the sequel, and has said that her role was significantly cut down. Heard earned $1 million for her role as Mera in “Aquaman,” which grossed $1 billion in 2018, and $2 million for “Aquaman 2,” due out next year. “But they can’t work with her right now.”Īrnold compared Heard’s earnings to a series of other “comparable” actors - Jason Momoa, Ana de Armas, Gal Gadot, Zendaya and Chris Pine - to draw conclusions about what her career trajectory could have looked like, were it not for Waldman’s statements. “In the industry, they like her work,” Arnold said.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |